A review of results in a drug screening is a very important factor for all testing programs. A result deemed invalid, adulterated, or substituted doesn’t automatically mean a tampered sample, nor does positive drug testing results doesn’t necessarily mean that people use illegal substances.
To make detailed interpretations of possible alternative medical explanations of the results, the DOHHS or Department of Health and Human Services calls for MRO or Medical Review Officers’ expert opinion for this purpose. Each credible drug screening lab needs these professional services to provide an independent and expert analysis of positive test outcomes confidentially.
In the event that results are positive, these professionals will decide if it is indicative of drug screening lab in violations of the workplace rules and regulations or if there are other acceptable explanations for this kind of result.
For more information about Department of Health and Human Services, check out this site for details.
Qualification of MROs
Based on the Health and Human Services’ mandatory guidelines for workplace drug testing programs, MROs need to be a licensed doctor with a degree in Doctor of Osteopathy or Doctor of medicine. They need to have:
Expert knowledge in pharmacology and toxicology of illegal substances and drugs
Professional training in Human Health Services guidelines for workplace drug screening programs, as well as the chain of custody like reporting and record keeping customs for samples
Proper procedures for reviews, interpretations, and reporting of test results as identified by federal agencies and bureaus served by MROs
Passed the exam conducted by a Human Health Services-approved organization like a sub-specialty board for doctors focusing on the review of federal workers’ testing results or a certifying agency for Medical Review Officers
Restrictions for MROs
The MRO may be an employee or independent contractor of federal agencies. They are the point of contact between the donor, the collector, the company’s representative, and the testing facility. They cannot be:
A staff, worker, or anyone with financial interests in any IITF (Instrumented Initial Test Facility) or testing laboratories where the professional is checking the result of tests
In agreement with labs or Instrumented Initial Test Facility that could be seen as a conflict of interest, or receive financial gains by recommending the use of specific screening facilities
These conditions are put in place to help prevent a possible agreement between the MRO and drug testing facilities that could jeopardize or influence partiality in checking test results.
Want to know more about urine drug screening? Visit https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/323378 for more info.
Responsibilities of MROs
MROs review all samples that have been reported positive, invalid for screening, adulterated, substituted, or rejected from testing laboratories. They are tasked to report the verified or confirmed results to state agencies. They need to make sure that all samples reported as dilute or negative are appropriately reviewed and reported to the right agency.
These professionals review every state agency blind sample’s outcomes and do the investigation into the test results that aren’t consistent.
They conduct or facilitate the … Read More...